Direct material variances
The direct material total variance is the difference between what the output actually cost and what it should have cost, in terms of material.
From the example above the material total variance is given by:
$ | |
1,000 units should have cost (x $50) | 50,000 |
But did cost | 46,075 |
Direct material total variance | 3, 925 (F) |
The direct material price variance
This is the difference between what the actual quantity of material used did cost and what it should have cost.
$ | |
4,850 kgs should have cost (x $10) | 48,500 |
But did cost | 46,075 |
Direct material price variance | 2,425 (F) |
This is the difference between how much material should have been used for the number of units actually produced and how much material was used, valued at standard cost
1,000 units should have used (x 5 kgs) | 5,000 kgs |
But did use | 4,850 kgs |
Variance in kgs | 150 kgs (F) |
Valued at standard cost per kg | x $10 |
Direct material usage variance in $ | $1,500 (F) |
Direct labour total variance
The direct labour total variance is the difference between what the output should have cost and what it did cost, in terms of labour.
$ | |
1,000 units should have cost (x $20) | 20,000 |
But did cost | 21,210 |
Direct material price variance | 1,210 (A) |
This is the difference between what the actual number of hours worked should have cost and what it did cost.
4200hrs should have cost (4200hrs x $5) | $21000 |
But did cost | $21210 |
Direct labour rate variance | $210(A) |
The is the difference between how many hours should have been worked for the number of units actually produced and how many hours were worked, valued at the standard rate per hour.
$ | |
1,000 units should have taken (x 4 hrs) | 4,000 hrs |
But did take | 4,200 hrs |
Variance in hrs | 200 hrs |
Valued at standard rate per hour | x $5 |
Direct labour efficiency variance | $1,000 (A) |
No comments:
Post a Comment